held that so long as the licensee has not been
evicted in execution of the decree lawfully obtained, his
possession under ... appellant
may remain in possession until he is ejected in due course
in execution of the decree in the suit filed by the
respondent
landlords had obtained an effective decree and had succeeded in ejecting the tenants as a result of that decree, which might have become final between ... parties, that decree might not have been reopened and the execution taken thereunder might not have refused. But the second notification had come
landlords had obtained an effective decree and had
succeeded in ejecting the tenants as a result of that decree, which might
have become final between ... parties, that decree might not have been
reopened and the execution taken thereunder might not have refused. But the
second notification had come
Mahadeo Savlaram Shelke And Ors. vs Puna Municipal Corporation And Anr. on 24 January, 1995
Chameli Singh And Others Etc. vs State Of U.P. And Another on 15 December
Mahadeo Savlaram Shelke & Ors vs The Puna Municipal Corpn. & Anr on 23 January
Chameli Singh vs State Of U.P on 15 December, 1995
Author: K. Ramaswamy
Bench
