with no other option but to pass the eviction order. Accordingly, the
ejectment application was allowed without issuing notice of the application
to the tenant ... fixed. The landlord, in the
meanwhile, filed an application for execution of the ejectment order before
the trial Court which was supported by an affidavit
service, and
accordingly, vide order dated 06.01.2011 ex parte ejectment order was
passed against her. Execution proceedings were filed by the respondent
Court, Phagwara is directed to decide the execution
application by 15.05.2012 since it is contended that the ejectment order was
passed on 07.10.2003.
5. Accordingly
deposit and only
when the execution petition had been filed and he was forced to protect
himself from ejectment, he filed the application for stay
execution proceedings arise out of the eviction proceedings and the order
dated 24.08.2007 passed by the Rent Controller, Yamuna Nagar on the
ejectment application ... prays for stay, whereas learned counsel for the respondent
states that no execution has been filed till date.
Now to come up for arguments
Supreme Court that after the order of ejectment, the contractual rate of rent
comes to an end and the landlord is not bound ... opinion reasonably compensate the
decree-holder for loss occasioned by delay in execution of
decree by the grant of stay order, in the event
which
C.R. No. 5569 of 2008 25
was a part of execution proceedings in Ramji Lal vs. Municipal Committee
showed that four persons were ... ejectment order is
specific and ejectment has been ordered as per para no. 1 of the plaint which
is in consonance with the description given
petition
on 11.05.2007. It was also pleaded that in earlier petition for ejectment of
the same tenant on the ground of non-payment of rent ... virtue of a lease deed dated 08.09.2003
which was before the execution of the sale Deed and he was in a portion
which
Supreme Court that after the order of
ejectment, the contractual rate of rent comes to an end and the landlord is
not bound ... opinion reasonably compensate the
decree-holder for loss occasioned by delay in execution of
decree by the grant of stay order, in the event
with him. Thus, it may be noticed that in the
application for ejectment the respondent-landlord has
specifically averred that petitioner is a tenant ... Thereafter, the landlord-respondent filed an execution application
before the Rent Controller, Chandigarh and in the execution proceedings,
the petitioner filed an application for being
