this appeal arises was being
taken up along with a suit for ejectment of the appellant/plaintiff from the
premises filed by the respondent/defendant ... suit for
ejectment filed by the respondent/defendant against the appellant/plaintiff
and/or in execution of the decree therein; and, (ii) it will
2014 bearing Unique ID
No.02402C0158212013) on admission of ejectment of the four legal heirs
of the deceased appellant Virender Kumar Sikka from the property ... again seeking stay of
execution contending that the appeal will become infructuous if during
pendency thereof the appellants are ejected. The said application has come
M/S Jagdambey Builders Pvt. Ltd. vs J.S. Vohra on 2 February, 2016
Equivalent
that the
respondent/plaintiff on execution of the MoU had put the appellant/defendant
in possession of the premises as proposed owner.
6. The respondent ... premises, so as to deny the respondent /
landlord the right to eject the appellant from the premises as a
tenant.
11. Section
Court, Delhi in CS No.1439/2011 (Unique ID No.02401C0338702011)] of
ejectment of the appellant from the shops on first and second floors above ... month w.e.f. June, 2011 till March, 2016 execution was
stayed. Vide subsequent order dated 28th March, 2016 the appellant was
permitted to deposit
when notice thereof was issued and the parties referred to mediation and
execution stayed. Mediation remained unsuccessful. The respondents ... occupation of the property
from which he has been ordered to be ejected since May, 2003.
7. On enquiry, it is informed that the enquiry
Birinder Singh Sabarwal vs Sardarni Satpal Kaur & Ors on 10 May, 2016
Author: Rajiv
Muthoot Finance Limited vs Kailash Rani & Ors on 4 May, 2016
Author: Rajiv Sahai
