order of rejection of his
application under Section 47 CPC in Ejectment
Execution Case No. 89 of 2013 arising out of Ejectment
Suit ... meantime the land
lord/DHR has put the ex-parte decree into execution by
filling Execution Case No. 89 of 2013 and where the
present
passed in Misc. Case no.
108/08 in an of ejectment execution case no. 187/05C.
The said impugned order was passed in relation
provide as under: -
"42. Restriction on ejectment.- A tenant shall not be ejected otherwise than in execution of a decree for ejectment, except ... said Act further provides that a tenant shall not be ejected otherwise than in execution of a decree for ejectment, except in the following
Bench, Presidency Small Causes
Court at Calcutta which was registered as Ejectment Suit No. 103 of 2005.
Lila Dasgupta, since deceased entered appearance ... dated 29.04.2006. The decree was put into execution
giving rise to Ejectment Execution Case No. 59 of 2011. The said Lila
Dasgupta died
Procedure Code filed in Execution Case No. 01 of 2013, which execution case was filed for execution of the ejectment decree passed by the learned ... standi to claim that she had the right to resist her ejectment through execution proceedings instituted for execution of a decree which was passed
defendant before the Division Bench of this
Court by which the execution proceedings was directed to be stayed
unconditionally for a period of two weeks ... pleased to
direct stay of all further proceedings in the Ejectment Execution Case No. 1 of
2016 filed by the plaintiff which was pending before
favour of the
petitioner, thereby staying its hands in respect of execution of the connected eviction
decree and/or protecting possession of the petitioner. However ... impugned order and granting unconditional stay of all further
proceedings in Ejectment Execution Case No. 47 of 2008 pending before the Civil
Judge (Junior Division
costs and rent upto March 31, 1972 An application for execution of the ejectment part of the decree was filed on May 17, 3972 stating ... decree-holders are not entitled to proceed with the execution of the decree for ejectment unless the judgment debtor fails to deposit the arrears
mentioned in proviso to Rule 5, the ejectment of the respondent, in execution can only be sought for during the period of 15th April ... Sethi does not say that the delivery of possession in execution of decree for ejectment could be taken at any time during the year
that by putting the said decree into execution in Ejectment Execution Case No. 72 of 1989, she got delivery of possession of the decretal premises ... Ejectment Suit No. 493/1988 against her son Baidyanath Banerjee and got a decree on 17.2.89 and that by putting the said decree into execution