property from the year 1926 to the year 1940 even after the execution of the sale-deed. Mr. Walawalkar contended that the possession of Laxman ... obtain a decree in ejectment against them. Now, there is nothing to show that the possession of Laxman after the execution of the sale deed
title to the property in the suit which the plaintiffs filed for ejectment of the defendants and for possession of the property.
3. The contention ... title in the plaintiffs because there is no proper admission of execution under Section 34 , Registration Act. Section 34 contemplates admission of execution either
person who has been made a party to the original ejectment proceedings by the landlord and such person alone can take advantage of Section ... tenant was a party to the ejectment proceeding in which an order for ejectment was passed. Mr. Lulla contends that every person
defendant did not hand over possession, the plaintiff filed a suit for ejectment on April 16, 1944, On April 16, 1945, a consent decree ... execute the decree and obtained possession under it. The executing Court ordered execution to issue. Prom that order there was an appeal preferred
Gurupadappa Shivlingappa vs Akbar Sayad Budan Kadri on 18 August, 1949
Equivalent citations: AIR1950BOM252, (1950
Mathuradas Vassanji And Anr. vs Tulsidas Damodar Ganatra on 5 October, 1949
Equivalent citations: AIR1950BOM321
