being Title suit No. 83 of 1928, and obtained a decree. In execution of that decree he purchased the mortgaged property on 14th April ... been put an end to by this ejectment decree and Harish had obtained khas possession in execution of it. With regard to the plaintiff
ejectment and rent made against them at the instance of the respondent and dated August 14, 1947, and all orders for execution made thereunder should
sale to be on a par with the remedy by ejectment. An ejectment can only be decreed in proceedings taken against all the tenants ... execution proceedings, that the only remedy of the excluded person is to redeem but such an excluded person cannot maintain ejectment against the purchaser
possession, he is a trespasser and is liable to be ejected therefrom. The defence raised certain questions as to the real person with whom ... below held that the prayer for ejectment, though otherwise valid, the defendant could not be ejected as ejectment was barred under Section 3, Bengal
following terms :
"He (vendor) must eject disseisors and others wrongfully in possession of the property sold or any part of it (Engell v. Fitch ... purchaser about the existence of the tenant at the time of execution of the agreement is proved. The word 'its nature
possession delivered the landlord on 10th October 1947 brought a suit in ejectment at the Calcutta Court of Small Causes being Suit ... Court being Suit No 3079 of 1948 for a declaration that the ejectment decree was null and void. In that suit by consent
Dawoo Doyal Kothari vs Giridhari Laha on 22 March, 1949
Equivalent citations: AIR1950CAL214, 54CWN12, AIR
Gour Mohan Roy And Ors. vs Sailendra Nath Saha Chowdhary on 27 July, 1949
Equivalent
Sm. Nagendra Bala Hore And Anr. vs Sree Sree Iswar Dakhina Kalimata Thakur on 13
Sm. Suraj Jan Bibee vs Banku Behary Saha on 8 September, 1949
Equivalent citations: AIR1950CAL428
