which determines the sub-tenancy and he may then be removed in execution of the decree under Rule 35 (1). See -- 'Sailendra Nath Bhattacharjaya ... bound by the decree for ejectment and lie may not, therefore, be removed In execution of
a decree against the tenant. He is, therefore, entitled
rights in the disputed land and, as such, was not liable to ejectment. This right has been conferred under the U. P. .Zamindari Abolition ... will be for the execution court to decide whether the appellant has acquired adivasi right and is not liable to ejectment. I, therefore
stranger into the joint family, the purchaser, by purchasing at an execution sale, acquires the right to compel the partition which his debtor might have ... Therefore, even in cases in which the auction purchaser purchases in the execution of a decree against a member of Hindu Mitakshara family just
filed a suit, No. 385 of 1943, against Debi Saran for his ejectment from the land in dispute. This suit was decreed ... this Court and also made an application for the stay of the execution of the decree till the disposal of the appeal.
This Court
Chintamoni Padhan And Ors. vs Paika Samal And Ors. on 17 February, 1956
Equivalent citations
Thangachi Nachial And Anr. vs Ahmed Hussain Malumiar And Ors. on 5 April, 1956
Equivalent
