protect him from ejectment. Section 4, Orissa Act X (10) of 1946 runs as follows:
"Any suit for the ejectment of any tenant, including ... service tenure, instituted before the commencement of this Act, or any execution proceeding arising therefrom, shall be disposed of as if Schedule 36, Orissa Tenancy
shall not be liable to be evicted therefrom whether in execution of a decree or otherwise, except in certain circumstances specified in this section ... suit for eviction and a bar even to the execution of a decree even if it had been obtained before the Act had come into
plaint mentioned property. The plaintiffs-respondents purchased the property in execution of a decree passed on foot of a mortgage executed on the 15th April ... defence raised by the appellant is that before he is ejected, he should be paid Rs. 10,000 which was paid by him towards certain
Manujendra Dutt vs Purendu Prosad Roy Chowdhury & Ors on 22 September, 1966
Equivalent citations
Raval And Co. And Anr. vs K.G. Ramachandran (Minor) And Ors. on 20 January
Sri Kakulam Subrahmanyam And Anr. vs Kurra Subba Rao, Minor By Manikyamma on 22 November
Sadashiv Mahadeorao Pokle (Since ... vs Mahesh Baban Pokle, Suresh Baban Pokle, ... on 28 February, 2008
Ashokkumar Manilal vs Gandhi Vrajilal Gabrrulal Dessa on 8 February, 1995
Equivalent citations: AIR1995GUJ161, (1995
Sharafat Ullah Khan vs Raja Udairaj Singh on 2 March, 1959
Equivalent citations: AIR1959ALL416, ILR
Mylapore Hindu Permanant Ltd. Madras vs K. S. Subramania Iyer on 6 May, 1970
Equivalent
