must have an order from the execution Court for the execution of his decree or order for ejectment. Bearing in mind the provisions of Section ... sown after November 29, 1929, when the execution Court first ordered the execution of the order for ejectment, but they contend that the order
must have an order from the execution Court for the execution of his decree or order for ejectment. Bearing in mind the provisions of Section ... sown after 29fch November 1929 when the execution Court first ordered the execution of the order for ejectment, but they contend that that order
This decree was put into execution on Aug. 26,. 1969 by Ejectment Execution Case No. 611 of 1969. On Nov. 12, 1969 the opposite party ... July 1979 for rendering vacant possession. Further proceedings of Ejectment Execution case remained stayed from May 7, 1970 to July 31, 1979. On July
principles of res-judicata on
account of non execution of the ejectment order passed in 1957. The
aforesaid decision was given only by deciding issue ... aforesaid, it is held :
i) That on account of non execution of the ejectment order
passed in 1957 which was in executable as there
possession of the same on 19th November 1931 in execution of the decree for ejectment. Issue No. 3 put the plaintiff to the proof ... physical possession of the property in execution of the decree for ejectment. As a result of the decision on issues
16th August, 1999, the opposite party No.1 filed Ejectment Execution
Case No.58 of 1999 against Anil Kumar Basak, since deceased, though ... Presidency Small Causes Court at Calcutta and
renumbered as Ejectment Execution Case No.31 of 1999. The opposite party No.1
also filed an application
appellants to show cause on 24.2.2005 as to why the Ejectment Execution Case No. 181/2004 filed by the plaintiff/respondent should not be granted
being decreed,
drawn up execution proceeding numbered as Ejectment Execution Case No. 44 of
1994. In that proceeding the Defendant no. 2, being ... family members.
Subsequently, the original Plaintiff proceeded with the Ejectment Execution
Case No. 44 of 1994 and the Defendant no. 2 preferred appeal against
declaration that the decree passed by the Revenue Court, the ejectment proceedings in execution of it and the grant of the lease to defendant ... Court for a declaration that the rent decree and the ejectment proceedings in execution of it and the grant of the lease to another person
execution petition was to move an application
for the continuation of the execution proceedings. Since the
execution proceedings have been abandoned, the suit for
ejectment ... during the
pendency of the proceedings can continue the execution
proceedings or file fresh execution proceedings. But they do
not impose any embargo
