CALCUTTA 483
JUDGMENT
1. This appeal arises out of a suit for ejectment of the defendant who is the appellant before us after service of notice ... entitled to a decree for ejectment.
7. The ground, however, upon which the right of the plaintiffs to eject is contested by the defendant
Restriction on execution of decree or orderNo order or decree of any Court whereby a tenant has been ordered to be ejected from
what is prohibited-namely, that the interest of the seller to eject the highest price, and of the buyer to get the lowest price ... respect that it does not afford proper evidence of the execution by Lachhman Das-one of the signatories to the deed of transfer.
7. These
CALCUTTA 647
JUDGMENT
1. This appeal arises out of suit in ejectment. The defendants Nos. 1 and 3 were the owners of a non-transferable ... interest' to defendant No. 1 who subsequently purchased that interest in execution of his mortgage decree. After that the defendants
ejectment suit. The Defendant's defence was a denial of the Plaintiff's title. The Plaintiff claimed title as purchaser at an execution
rent against a daughter in possession was a personal decree, in execution of which only her life interest could be sold. No reasons are given ... Tenancy Act, have enforced it by proceedings in ejectment, and had he done so, the entire tenure would have been lost to the family
fallacious. It is true that their income at the time of the execution of the mortgage might not have been decreased. The mortgage, however ... deprived of all control over these particular tenants, of the right of ejecting them or enhancing their rents, and should there at any time
ejectment suit. The defendant's defence was a denial of the plaintiff's title. The plaintiff claimed title as purchaser at an execution
right in deciding in favour of the defendants.
5. The suits for ejectment, brought by the plaintiffs, were lodged on the 9th August ... Trial court's decrees were passed on the 24th July 1920. Execution of those decrees was stayed from the 7th January
citations: AIR1924CAL647
JUDGMENT
1. This appeal arises out of a suit in ejectment. The defendants Nos. 2 and 3 were the owners ... their interest to defendant No. 1 who subsequently purchased that interest in execution of his mortgage decree. After that the defendants
