that event the said order was to be deemed as permission for execution of the decree of the civil court obtained by the respondent against ... eviction. The Financial Commissioner also observed that since a decree of ejectment passed against the petitioner and in favor of the first respondent
Shyam Kishore vs Union Of India And Ors. on 1 July, 1995
Equivalent citations: 1995IIIAD
Gillanders Arbuthnot & Co. Ltd. vs Maya Kapoor on 1 October, 1995
Equivalent citations: 1995
Gillander Arbuthnot & Co. vs Maya Kapoor on 9 October, 1995
Equivalent citations: 60(1995
arrears of rent; the premises being in slum areas, prayer for ejectment was barred for want of permission under Section 19 of the Slum Areas ... conclusion that Panchayatnama had been executed by the appellants and the execution was not because of any fraud or misrepresentation. Therefore, it was argued
A.F. Ferguson & Co. vs Lalita Khanna on 1 November, 1995
Equivalent citations: 1995IVAD
