defendant for ejectment in
O.S.No.7682/2008 and said suit came to be decreed and
Execution Petition came to be filed ... ejectment stating
that the 8th defendant was his tenant and thereafter the
said suit came to be decreed and Execution Petition
No.128/2010 came
Hence, with out any alternative the
Complainant had filed a suit for ejectment and arrears of rent against
this Accused ... comply the Judgment and vacated the
premises, the Complainant filed an Execution Petition No.1149/2010
before Hon'ble City Civil Judge Bangalore
contract
contemplate the execution of a further contract between the
parties, it is a question of construction whether the execution of
the further contract ... reported in
2003( 66) DRJ 191 Sohan Singh 's case for ejectment and
decree for damages, the Hon'ble Delhi High Court
contract
contemplate the execution of a further contract between the
parties, it is a question of construction whether the execution of
the further contract ... reported in
2003( 66) DRJ 191 Sohan Singh 's case for ejectment and
decree for damages, the Hon'ble Delhi High Court
right in plaintiff's favour.
It is further stated that the execution of the alleged sale deed
is not admitted by the defendant ... court fee on the market value, as such the mere suit for
ejectment is not maintainable. It is further stated that the suit
tenancy of the
defendant and she has filed this suit for ejectment and
prayed to handover the vacant possession of the suit
schedule property ... examination, the learned counsel for the
defendant very much harped upon the execution of the
GPA and filing of this suit. However, the defendant
still
the owner of the property and he has every right to eject the
defendant from the schedule premises. On the contrary, the
counsel ... argued that sale is confirmed by
Hon'ble High Court and execution of sale deed is a mere formality,
that on confirmation of sale
take
cognizance of not only a bare suit for ejectment but also a
suit for ejectment with a prayer for recovery of mesne
profits ... relied on Section 68 of Evidence Act,
which envisages about proof of execution of document
required by law to be attested.
Defendant relied
access from ground floor only. This view is further
fortified from the execution of two separate lease deeds in
respect of ground floor and first ... said suit is pending
for adjudication, as such the present suit for ejectment of first
floor is not maintainable. This contention is not tenable because
take
cognizance of not only a bare suit for ejectment but also a
suit for ejectment with a prayer for recovery of mesne
profits ... relied on Section 68 of Evidence Act,
which envisages about proof of execution of document
required by law to be attested.
Defendant relied
