removed from possession of the premises
aforesaid in execution of the ejectment decree obtained by the defendant
no.1 against the defendant ... cannot be to restrain the defendant no.1 from,
in execution of the said ejectment decree, dispossessing the plaintiff from
the premises.
15. The remedy
ejectment of the appellants/defendants from immovable property, and
axiomatically passing a decree in favour of respondents/plaintiffs and against
the appellants/defendants of ejectment ... passed a decree for ejectment with respect to the said plots and ought to
have confined the decree for ejectment with respect to plot
senior counsel for the appellant that in pursuance
to the execution filed by the respondent/plaintiff, the bailiff visited the
premises yesterday, for delivering possession ... appellants/defendants are still in possession and
have not been ejected as yet.
10. The counsel for the respondent/plaintiff controverts and states that
Delhi Development Authority & Ors vs Pushpa Lata & Ors on 30 April, 2020
Equivalent
Rent Control Act did not apply. The landlord filed a suit for
ejectment against the father and three sons on the ground that their
tenancy ... question was a joint/composite
one and the tenant, faced with ejectment, could not be permitted to so
split up the single tenancy.
I fail
Ram Bhateri Sharma & Anr vs M/S Mahabir Steel & Ors on 3 May
