complaint, he
has not mentioned regarding filing of suits for ejectment
and recovery of rents against the accused. It is also not
stated ... issued towards
security. He has admitted that the ejectment suits were
filed and subsequently execution petitions were filed by the
10
complainant. He has produced
occupied by the second defendant's
wife in execution of a decree for ejectment against her.
28
16. The second defendant in his chief ... jurisdiction to try the suit,
iv. Whether the plaintiffs are entitled for
ejectment of the first defendant from the suit
schedule property as claimed
document are ambiguous or
unclear. However, the present case is one for ejectment
and thus the Trial Court rightly did not traverse beyond
the realm ... Court to have decreed the suit for
46
ejectment if the defendant had not admitted the
execution of Ex.P2 and the Court would
defendants challenging the judgment and decree of
the Courts below directing ejectment of the
defendants from the suit premises.
2. For the sake of convenience ... suit premises to
the defendants and therefore, the execution of the
judgment and decree of ejectment by the plaintiff
would be inconsequential and that
defendant which was a
sine qua non in a suit for ejectment. He contended that
the plaintiff was never the owner of the suit property ... that the plaintiff had a
15
right to present a suit for ejectment. He further contended
that the report of the Commissioner had only
Sessions Judge, Bangalore City, (CCH No.2), partly
allowing the suit for ejectment.
This RFA coming on for Admission this day,
ALOK ARADHE, J., delivered ... appellant and the
respondent be granted liberty to initiate the Execution
proceedings for recovery of arrears of rent.
3. In view of the aforesaid submission
Bellur Usha Shivaprasad vs Smt. Sarasamba Anantha Swamy on 2 June, 2020
Author: Aravind Kumar
Sri. R. Anthony Joseph vs Sri. Francis Billomane on 23 December, 2020
Bench: B.Veerappa
M/S Narayana Swamy And Sons vs Shri K T Rajashekar on 20 January, 2020
such,
32
there was no necessary for going for the execution of
the registered sale deed and the defendant No.1
would be the person ... consideration herein, is the resistance
of the defendants in the suit for ejectment of the
plaintiffs and sale agreement dated 2.11.1992 marked
