petitioner is the defendant in the suit filed by the
respondents for ejectment in respect of the suit schedule property.
According to the respondents, they ... virtue of
G.O.Ms.No.2000 dated 16.08.1976. After execution of notice, the
respondents filed a suit.
3. The petitioner filed a written statement
landlords had obtained an effective decree and had
succeeded in ejecting the tenants as a result of that
decree, which may have become final between ... parties, that decree may not have been re-opened and
the execution taken thereunder may not have been
recalled. But it was during the pendency
established that there was a failure to take
steps to eject within a period of time that stands duly prescribed under ... must also be had to the fact that for the purposes
of execution of an order of eviction made under the Act, the revenue
Signature
respondent filed
E.P.No.150 of 2016 and in that execution petition, he brought
on sale the plaint schedule property of 4.64 acres ... agreement. The
4
Ex.F.A.No.20 of 2021
execution court put the southern 2.32 acres of land alone on
auction
contend that even a transferee pendent lite can obstruct
and resist the execution of a decree and consequently can initiate proceedings
under Order XXI Rules ... Court was
considering the right of a sub-tenant to resist the execution of a decree. In this
case, the sub-tenancy
Constitution of India seeking to issue a direction to the
Principal Munsiff (Execution Court), Irinjalakuda to consider
and pass orders on Exts ... independent right of tenancy and
therefore they are not liable to be ejected from the premises.
They have also filed Exts
transferor landlord would be proper
and so also the suit for ejectment. Thus, in my prima facie
view, considering that both the Trial Court ... Civil Revision Application is
expedited.
v) The implementation and / or execution of the
impugned Judgment and Decree dated 5 th January, 2017
and 12th September
transferor landlord would be proper
and so also the suit for ejectment. Thus, in my prima facie
view, considering that both the Trial Court ... Civil Revision Application is
expedited.
v) The implementation and / or execution of the
impugned Judgment and Decree dated 5 th January, 2017
and 12th September
Trial Court
held that the defendant had failed to prove the execution
of the sale agreement. Hence, it decreed the suit and
directed to quit ... Karnataka Rent Act, 1999 was
applicable and a suit for ejectment was not maintainable.
9. The First Appellate Court considered the
contention urged
Case No. 02/2015 is put to
challenge.
On 04.04.1973, on execution of a registered sale deed, late Ganesh Chandra Dutta had purchased
a plot ... suit being TS 13/1985 against the present petitioners praying for their
ejectment and for recovery of possession of 5 lechas of land
