respondents authorities to restore the gaon sabha land as Gaddha (Pond) after ejecting the respondent No.6 from Arazi No.287-B area about ... been passed for ejectment and damages.
7. Procedure has been prescribed under Revenue Law for implementation/ execution of the order passed n the revenue proceeding
suit for ejectment and rent was filed by the respondent, which was decreed exparte, thereafter the said decree was put in execution. The petitioner took
Sealdah, South 24-Parganas in
Ejectment Appeal No.8 of 2024. By the order
impugned the execution case was stayed subject to
payment of occupational
counsel for the petitioner submitted that in spite of the order for ejectment and damages dated 13.09.2024 passed by Tehsildar in the proceeding under Section ... under Para-460 of U.P. Revenue Court Manual for the implementation/ execution of the orders passed under Section 67 of U.P. Revenue Code
submitted that in spite of the order passed by the Tehsildar for ejectment and damages against private respondent, in respect to the plot in question ... gaon sabha submitted that the instant public interest litigation for implementation/execution of the order passed in the proceeding under Section
proceeding under Section 67 U.P. Revenue Code order for ejectment and damages has been passed on 26.06.2024 against persons concerned. He further submitted that ... restoration application dated 21.08.2024 has been filed against the order of ejectment dated 26.06.2024 which is pending for consideration before the Tehsildar and next date
Section 67 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, an order for ejectment and damages has been passed by the Tehsildar against the private respondent ... order for ejectment and damages has been passed by the Tehsildar on 26.12.2019 in respect to the plot in question.
7. For execution
Revenue Code, 2006 has been passed by the Tahsildar for ejectment and damages against respondent nos.5 & 6. They further submitted that notice ... order for ejectment and damages has been passed by the Tehsildar against respondent nos.5 & 6.
8. For execution of the order passed under
counsel for the petitioner submitted that in spite of the order for ejectment and damages dated 28.06.2025 passed by Tehsildar in the proceeding under Section ... given effect on spot. He further submitted that against the order for ejectment and damages, no appeal has been filed by respondent
spite of the final order passed by the Tehsildar on 27.6.2025 for ejectment and damages in respect to the plot in question, the order ... order for ejectment and damages has been passed by the Tehsildar in respect to the plot in question on 27.6.2025.
7. For execution
