that appeared, the record of the
Ejectment Execution Case no.81 of 2008 has been called
for and that is why the execution case could ... allowed. The learned
Executing court is directed to dispose of the Ejectment
Execution Case no. 81 of 2008 as early as possible. He
shall call
Misc. case No.252 of 2008 arising out of an
Ejectment Execution Case No.166 of 2007 which arose out of an
Ejectment Suit ... Court, Calcutta.
The short fact is that the opposite party instituted the
ejectment suit no.5 of 2003 against one Smt. Shyama Bagchi, a
tenant
matter I find that the
application is at the stage of execution of the decree with the help of the Police.
So, there is urgency ... Accordingly, an interim
order of stay of the execution case being Ejectment Execution Case No.13 of 2007
is granted till 14th December, 2010.
Learned
Civil Judge (Junior Division),
2nd Court at Ranaghat in Title Execution Case no. 16 of
2004
Upon perusal of the material placed in support ... levels. The decree for ejectment was passed
against the petitioner. He preferred an appeal which was
lost. Thereafter, execution application was filed for
recovery
Trial Judge.
Thereafter, the plaintiff / decreeholder put the decree into
execution being the Title Execution Case No.10 of 2001. That
4
decree could ... correction of such decree of ejectment,
but the description of the suit premises in a better way for
proper execution of the same. The decreeholder
Calcutta in Misc. Case No.109 of 2009 arising out of
an Ejectment Case No.204 of 2007.
The short fact, necessary for the purpose ... Calcutta and that appeal was
dismissed. Thereafter, the decreeholder filed the Title Execution
Case No.204 of 2007 for execution of the decree for recovery
That there shall be an order or stay of Title Execution Case
being no. 22 of 2009 pending before the learned Executing
Court ... granted after a limited
period.
Accordingly, all the further proceeding of the
Ejectment Suit pending before the learned Civil Judge
(Junior Division), 2nd Court, Alipore
Manbodh Tiwari vs Onkar Nath Misir & Ors on 22 December, 2010
Author: Prasenjit Mandal
preferred.
The short fact is that the plaintiff filed the suit for
ejectment after revocation of licence against the defendants. She
2
is the owner ... reason the plaintiff has
specifically stated that no consideration was passed for execution
of such power of attorney. The attorney was directed to make
deposit
