against the order dated 9.12.1996 passed by respondent No. 2 in the execution proceedings and the order dated 15.4.1998 passed by revisional court, the respondent ... ejectment against the petitioner was passed in S.C.C. suit filed by respondent No. 3, he could not be dispossessed in execution
caveator.
2. It appears that respondent No. 3 filed suit for rent ejectment against the present petitioner which was decreed ex parte ... default. The decree-holder respondent No. 3 thereafter put the decree in execution, and before the executing court, the petitioner filed objections purporting
that on Small Causes Court side, only a suit for rent and ejectment by a lessor against a lessee after determination of lease is maintainable ... party so that there may not be any objection to the execution of decree against him also if the same is ultimately passed
Rama Shanker. The landlord Shree Kripa Krishan filed suit for ejectment against the tenant-Rama Shanker and the said suit was decreed by Judge Small ... dated 21.3.1978. Even before the decree of eviction could be put in execution, one Kailash Kumar. who according to the respondents is a close relative
Mohammad Nasir vs District Judge, Nainital And Others on 14 October, 1998
Equivalent citations: 1999
Rakesh Kumar vs Vith Additional District Judge, ... on 7 April, 1998
Equivalent citations: 1998(3
Smt. Usha Rani vs Prescribed Authority And Others on 17 July, 1997
Equivalent citations: 1998
separate paragraph further recited that suit for recovery of rent and ejectment shall be filed after the expiry of statutory period of notice prescribed under ... question subject to their depositing the entire decreetal amount uptodate in the execution court by 30.10.1998, failing which it shall be open for the landlord
Govind Prasad vs Iiird Addl. District Judge, Meerut And ... on 16 September, 1998
Equivalent citations
