determination of the Supreme Court was as under:
Whether a decree for ejectment passed by a Civil Court qua a commercial tenancy in the State ... appellant in execution. It is already held that it is the Controller under the Act that has exclusive jurisdiction to order ejectment of a tenant
directed that the standard rent application and the suit for ejectment be disposed of together. The Trial Judge decreed the suit for eviction on 12th ... Trial Court. On 4th October 1977, the Appellate Court stayed the execution of the decree but ordered the Respondents to deposit the rent
Noy Vallesina Engineering Spa A ... vs Jindal Drugs Limited, A Company ... on 5 June, 2006
Sumikin Bussan (Hong Kong) ... vs Manharlal Trikamdas Mody And Ing Bank, ... on 2 May, 2006
Ismalibhai Gulam Hussain vs Additional Collector And Ors. on 12 January, 2006
Equivalent citations: 2006
Ismailbhai Gulam Hussain vs Additional Collector And Ors. on 20 January, 2006
Equivalent citations: 2006
provision in Rent Control Order which prevents him from filing ejectment suit. In paragraph 24, it is further observed that when filing of appeal under ... that suit is premature and it should have, at the most subjected execution to and postponed it till decision of pending appeal of respondent
Kewalchand (Since Deceased Smt. K.K. ... vs Nemchand Mehta Through His Lrs. Mrs. ... on 26
Babulal S/O Fattelalji Upadhyaya vs Gajraj S/O Hansraj Pugalia on 9 January, 2006
