facts are similar inasmuch as here also the ejectment decree
was not put to execution and no permission even of the
Competent Authority under ... aforesaid, it is held :
i) That on account of non execution of the ejectment order
passed in 1957 which was in executable as there
some material facts by filing the
execution. He was wanting to take a technical benefit of the ejectment order
and not accepting the demand draft
came to the notice of the applicants/appellants, from their Counsel, when Execution Application/Criminal Petition, was filed by the Decree Holder/complainant ... consumer complaint, as they had vacated the premises, in pursuance of the ejectment order dated 21.10.2013 Annexure A-3, passed
consumer complaint, as they had vacated the premises, in pursuance of the ejectment order dated 21.10.2013 Annexure A-3, passed ... came to the notice of the applicants/appellants, from their Counsel, when Execution Application/Criminal Petition, was filed by the Decree Holders/complainants
came to the notice of the applicants/appellants, from their Counsel, when Execution Application/Criminal Petition, was filed by the Decree Holder/complainant ... consumer complaint, as they had vacated the premises, in pursuance of the ejectment order dated 21.10.2013 Annexure A-3, passed
consumer complaint, as they had vacated the premises, in pursuance of the ejectment order dated 29.10.2013 (infact 21.10.2013) Annexure A-3, passed ... appellants, from their Counsel, only on 27.04.2015, during the pendency of the Execution Application/Criminal Petition, filed by the Decree Holders/complainants. It was further
consumer complaint, as they had vacated the premises, in pursuance of the ejectment order dated 21.10.2013 Annexure A-4, passed by the Court ... appellants, from their Counsel, only on 30.03.2015, during the pendency of the Execution Application/Criminal Petition, filed by the Decree Holders/complainants. It was further
consumer complaint, as they had vacated the premises, in pursuance of the ejectment order dated 21.10.2013 Annexure A-4, passed ... notice of the applicants/appellants, when they received notice, in the Execution Application/Criminal Petition, filed by the Decree Holders/complainant. It was further stated
consumer complaint, as they had vacated the premises, in pursuance of the ejectment order dated 21.10.2013 Annexure A-3, passed by the Court ... notice of the applicants/appellants, when they received notice, in the Execution Application/ Criminal Petition, by the Decree Holder/complainant, on 04.04.2015. It was further
defendant is tenant in the schedule premises.
11. In a suit for ejectment, the plaintiff has to
prove the jural relationship of landlord and tenant ... ownership and right of the plaintiff to file a suit for
ejectment, the defendant is totally prohibited from
raising such question before the Court
