Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

Faslis. It was the appellant alone who had him ejected in execution and it was the appellant, alone who brought another suit against

have assumed that the effect of the order in ejectment and the proceedings in execution of that order would be to entitle the plaintiff ... holding, especially when the order of ejectment has been carried out by a process in execution in which the Court officer has necessarily to take

section (2) provides that in all cases of suits for the ejectment of a non-occupancy ryot for non-payment of arrears of rent ... 29th June 1909, the decree-holders applied for execution by way of ejectment. On the 3rd August following, the judgment-debtors applied for extension

have assumed that the effect of the order in ejectment and the proceedings in execution of that order would be to entitle the plaintiff ... holding, especially when the order of ejectment has been carried out by a process in execution in which the Court Officer has necessarily to take

defendant No. 2, who claims to be a purchaser in execution of a money-decree obtained against defendant No. 1, and defendant ... possession as a landlord who ejected defendant No. 2 on the ground that the transfer in execution to defendant No. 2 was void

landlord to eject a tenant otherwise than in accordance with the provisions of the Act. The provisions of the Act relating to ejectment of under ... Section 89 provides that no tenant shall be ejected from his tenure or holding except in execution of a decree and Section 49 lays down

made on the 20th February 1899. The property was sold in execution and was purchased by the decree-holder on the 19th September ... execution sale which followed, the property was sold on the 24th December 1863. The purchaser sued on the 12th March 1867 to eject the lessee

whether land held by an under-raiyat can be sold in execution of a decree for arrears of rent under the special procedure prescribed ... liable to ejectment for arrears of rent but his tenure or holding shall be liable to sale in execution of a decree for the rent

made on the 20th February 1899. The property was sold in execution and was purchased by the decree-holder on the 19th September ... execution sale which followed, the property was sold on the 24th December 1863. The purchaser sued on the 12th March 1867 to eject the lessee

defendant, lost its character as a rent decree, if, before execution was taken out, the plaintiff had ceased to be the landlord. This view, however ... entitled to execute the decree for ejectment. The same considerations, however, do not apply to an application for execution of a decree for rent