defendant, lost its character as a rent decree, if, before execution was taken out, the plaintiff had ceased to be the landlord. This view, however ... entitled to execute the decree for ejectment. The same considerations, however, do not apply to an application for execution of a decree for rent
appeal on behalf of the defendant in an action in ejectment. The subject-matter of the dispute is homestead land within the Bankura Municipality, originally ... Gopal Chundra Mukerjee under a ghatwal. In 1878, the Collector, id execution of a certificate under the Public Demands Recovery Act , made against Gopal Chundra
mortgagee to sue the trespasser in ejectment, who may well plead that no suit for ejectment lies and that there is no cause of action ... application to the case of adverse possession, which begins after the execution of a simple mortgage against the mortgagor. In that case the village Khard
appeal on behalf of the defendant in an action in ejectment. The subject matter of the dispute is homestead land within the Bankura Municipality, originally ... Gopal Chandra Mookerjee under a ghatwal. In 1878, the Collector, in execution of a certificate under the Public Demands Recovery Act made against Gopal Chandra
22nd of July, 1899, brought the properly to sale in execution of his own decree and purchased it himself. He obtained formal possession ... actual possession of which was with Bhagwan Das and Durga Prasad, in execution of a simple money decree against Nizam-ud-din. Bhagwan
true, it being now recognized that the plaintiff in a suit in ejectment has only to prove a better title to possession than the defendant ... various cases that when a lessee is evicted by a purchaser in execution of a decree, the landlord is also to be regarded as evicted
held that the remedy of the plaintiff was by way of the execution of the decree in the previous suit. This conclusion does not militate ... concerned, it was not a suit for partition, but an action in ejectment by the plaintiff who had been ousted by his co-sharers
plaintiff were in possession through Avomma, though not as jenmi, till the execution of the decree in Original Suit No. 33 of 1901, that ... plaintiff is sufficient to entitle the plaintiff to a decree in ejectment against the 17th defendant, a possesory title being good against all the world
Mamabi And Ors. vs Acharath Parakat--Maliga Purazil ... on 18 October, 1912
Equivalent citations: 17IND
