Tenancy for non-payment of rent, he could not be ejected otherwise than in execution of a decree or order under the provisions ... this must be taken with Section 89 which prohibits ejectment except in execution of a decree and Section 155 which affords relief against forfeitures. Section
kathas 6 dhurs still in possession of the defendants and for the ejectment of the defendants therefrom. He also claimed mesne profits at the rate ... execution of rent decrees before, during and after the terms of their ijara lease, and that, therefore, they could not be ejected. They denied that
liable to be ejected. He alleged that he was at the date of the execution of the document, a settled raiyat of the village holding ... Justice Newbould has accepted this contention and has dismissed the claim for ejectment.
4. The terms of the contract between the parties
appellant. He purchased in Court auction sale the plaint house in execution of a decree passed against the defendants ... obstruction to ejectment, it would be very unfair on purchasers from the surviving member of a Hindu family and on purchasers in execution of debts
JUDGMENT
1. This appeal arises out of a suit for ejectment. The plaintiffs in the suit are the owners of an osat taluq ... Salim, fell into arrears. A suit was brought against him and in execution of a decree obtained, the holding was purchased by the ijaradar. Having
JUDGMENT
Newbould, J.
1. This appeal arises out of a suit in ejectment. The plaintiff failed in the first Court but was successful ... plaintiff, who was a co-sharer landlord purchased a raiyati holding in execution of a mortgage, decree in 1904. In 1905 he granted the defendant
ejectment of defendants Nos. 1 and 2 from certain land in the Municipality of Tamluk. The defendants purchased the land in execution of a money ... attempt had been made by all the brothers to eject the defendants Nos. 1 and 2 from the land. That suit ended in Rakhal compromising
appellant. He purchased in court auction sale the plaint house in execution of a decree passed against defendants 2, 3 and 4. The defendants ... obstruction to ejectment it would be very unfair on purchasers from the surviving members of a Hindu family and on purchasers in execution of debts
also included objections to the validity of Krishnier's purchase in execution. But they are not relied on here. The question argued is whether ... possession against plaintiff, successor in interest of Krishnier, or whether he can eject them only either on payment to them of what they spent
obtained a decree for arrears of rent against his raiyat and in execution of that decree put up the holding to sale and purchased ... dismissid the suit in so far as it was a suit for ejecting the defendants and granted the plaintiff a decree merely declaring his title
