owner who omits for some reason or other to take steps to eject the trespasser before the latter completes the period of possession required ... present plaintiff could not make use of it for ejecting the present defendant in execution of that decree. He waited too long to institute this
decrees were passed against them, and although, execution was taken out and they were ejected m duo course of law, they nevertheless continued in possession
Musammat, Kirpa Devi. Shib Charan Das then applied in execution for the ejectment of the judgment debtors. The Courts below have refused to grant ... decree. The learned Counsel for the appellant Shib Charan Das argued that execution can now be obtained by a transferee of a property under
whose widow is the defendant respondent in these litigations) purchased at an execution sale held on the 20th December 1887, the lands of an under ... Chowdhury, became purchaser at the execution sale. As already stated, Banerjee and Sarkar had made no attempt to eject Chowdhury from the lands of Daskati
brought in the Revenue Court by the present appellant for the ejectment of the defendants from certain plots of land. The court of first instance ... instance that decree was put into execution and the present appellant obtained possession of the holding by ejectment of the tenants. After the decree
defendants-appellants were no parties, has a right to eject the defendants, the purchasers in execution of a decree, based on a puisne mortgage
owner who omits for some reason or other to take steps to eject the trespasser before the latter completes the period of possession required ... present plaintiff could not make use of it for ejecting the present defendant in. execution of that decree. He waited too long to institute
decrees were passed against them, and although execution was taken out and they were ejected in due course of law, they nevertheless continued in possession
brought in the Revenue Court by the present appellant for the ejectment of the defendants from certain plots of land. The Court of first instance ... instance that decree was put into execution and the present appellant obtained possession of the holding by ejectment of the tenants. After the decree
plots in suit and the plaintiff got a decree against them for ejectment and obtained possession through the Court Amin on the 17th of February ... Court Amin on the 17th of February 1919, in execution of the decree, for ejectment passed by this Court, the defendants are interfering with
