Ejectment Suit No.281 of 2004(E) and all
proceeding arising there from;
b) A declaration be given for hearing of Ejectment Execution Case ... Court all records
relating to Ejectment Suit no.281 of 2004 (E) and Ejectment Execution Case
No.193 of 2006 so that conscionable justice
that appeared, the record of the
Ejectment Execution Case no.81 of 2008 has been called
for and that is why the execution case could ... allowed. The learned
Executing court is directed to dispose of the Ejectment
Execution Case no. 81 of 2008 as early as possible. He
shall call
ejectment order aforementioned by averring that they were not
made parties to the ejectment action and, thus, they are not bound
by the ejectment order ... land in question as co-owners
and cannot be ejected in execution of the ejectment order which
never ever came to be granted against them
This observation is factually incorrect because even ex
parte ejectment order, in execution whereof the plaintiff was
dispossessed, was passed on 02.08.1999 and, therefore ... possession of the disputed shop from the defendant
because the ejectment order in execution whereof the defendant had
taken possession of the disputed shop
suit, the decree-holder filed an execution case being Ejectment Execution Case No. 94 of 2000 before the
learned Second Bench, Small Causes Court
legal
representative.
Respondent-decree holder filed execution petition in the year
2003 for execution of the ejectment order. Petitioner preferred objections
in the execution petition ... demised property pursuant to ejectment order and therefore,
petitioner is not liable to be ejected from the demised property in execution
of the ejectment order
against the order passed by
the learned Appellte Authority, the execution of the ejectment order was
stayed. However, the said order was vacated by this ... petitioner
denied the execution of the agreement at the very first instance when this
Court vacated the stay of execution of ejectment order
Misc. case No.252 of 2008 arising out of an
Ejectment Execution Case No.166 of 2007 which arose out of an
Ejectment Suit ... Court, Calcutta.
The short fact is that the opposite party instituted the
ejectment suit no.5 of 2003 against one Smt. Shyama Bagchi, a
tenant
19th June, 2010 for recovery of
possession of the suit property by execution of the writ of
possession by police help.
Under such circumstances ... case, this court passes an order staying all further
proceeding of Ejectment Execution Case No. 11 of 2009
pending before the learned Civil Judge (Junior
opposite parties intimating the above order.
All further proceedings of Ejectment Execution Case No. 70 of 2007
pending before the learned Judge 3rd Bench
