Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

sound mind at the time of execution. In that case, two suits for ejectment were consolidated and tried. Dissatisfied with the decree, an appeal

Mr. A. Manohar Prasad vs Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited Author: P.T.Asha Bench: P

Mr. A. Manohar Prasad vs Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited Author: P.T.Asha Bench: P

Mr. A. Manohar Prasad vs Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited Author: P.T.Asha Bench: P

appellant is as tenant at sufferance and is liable to ejectment in due course of law. But his possession is not legal nor lawful ... appellant may remain in possession until he is ejected in due course in execution of the decree in the suit filed by the respondent

ejectment was granted. Hence, the respondent filed M.P.No.284 of 2004 under section 47 CPC challenging the maintainability of the execution proceedings. Though ... decree of ejectment passed by the trial Court is without jurisdiction and it is a nullity. The trial Court and the execution court failed

property. 9. While that being so, the petitioner filed a suit for ejectment in respect of the suit properties ... other amenities. Now, the first respondent filed a execution petition to execute the decree of ejectment as against the predecessors-in-title over the suit

also dismissed. After considering all the factual details, the Execution Court has dismissed the execution petition filed under Section 47 of the Civil Procedure Code ... well settled that the Execution Court cannot go behind the decree. In the ejectment suit, a decree was passed directing the petitioner / defendant to vacate

Suit for ejectment in O.S.No.137 of 1995, in which an exparte decree was passed in the year 1998. An Execution Petition

Suit for ejectment in O.S.No.137 of 1995, in which an exparte decree was passed in the year 1998. An Execution Petition