must have an order from the execution Court for the execution of his decree or order for ejectment. Bearing in mind the provisions of Section ... sown after November 29, 1929, when the execution Court first ordered the execution of the order for ejectment, but they contend that the order
must have an order from the execution Court for the execution of his decree or order for ejectment. Bearing in mind the provisions of Section ... sown after 29fch November 1929 when the execution Court first ordered the execution of the order for ejectment, but they contend that that order
word ejected and not a suit for ejectment. But the word ejected is followed by the expression under the law. Ejected under the law would ... trespasser ejected under Section 180 of the U. P. Tenancy Act but was an occupancy tenant and he had been ejected under the execution
land was sold in execution of a decree, when he was ejected in execution of a decree or order of a Court, when he surrendered ... heirless, did not surrender or abandon the holding, was not ejected in execution of a decree or order of a Court etc. The only effect
that a suit for ejectment should be decreed but the execution department should not eject the tenant in execution of the decree; and thirdly ... learned counsel to raise this point in the execution department, if an application for execution by ejectment is filed by the D. H. In view
inherit it, (b) in land from which he has been ejected in execution of a decree or order of a Court, (c) in a holding ... extinction of the right of occupancy when a tenant has been ejected in execution of a decree or order of a Revenue Court
heirless, did not surrender or abandon the holding, was not ejected in execution of a decree or order of a Court etc. The only effect ... held that a sub-tenant even after ejectment in execution of decree continues to be sub-tenant.
5. For deciding nature of right a person
decree for arrears of rent or from which he has been ejected in execution of a decree or order of a court;
(c) subject ... suit for his eviction is filed and he is actually ejected in execution of a decree.
20. Sri G. N. Verma relied upon Bam Dular
whether the permission given to file a civil suit for ejectment or for the execution of the civil Court's decree for ejectment entitled ... into force were interpreted to mean "to institute proceedings for execution by ejectment of the tenant" and in the case of a suit
ejectment on 20-8-1940. That decree had not been executed by September 1940. The defendants were liable to be ejected in execution ... same as in September 1940. They remained liable to ejectment in execution of the decree dated 20-8-1940. Since the respondents were liable
