respondent-plaintiff by the bailiff of the court in execution of order of
ejectment. Respondent-plaintiff claimed arrears of rent from March ... when the possession was delivered to him by bailiff in execution
of order of ejectment. Suit filed by respondent-plaintiff was dismissed by
learned trial
mention that the
respondent/landlord filed an execution petition no.35 of
18.7.2009 for execution of the decree passed by the Ld.Rent
Controller ... after passing of the ejectment order dated
24.12.2008 by the Ld.Rent Controller, Jagraon."
6. As already discussed above, execution petition was already
filed
paid. The last date for execution of the sale-deed was fixed as
31.12.2000. Smt.Sumitra Gadhoke also filed ejectment petition against the
tenants occupying
direction to learned Civil Judge,
Junior Division, Ludhiana, to decide the execution application No.35, dated
6.8.1998 titled as Narinder Singh v. Mukhwinder Singh, expeditiously ... learned counsel for the petitioner that
an ex parte order of ejectment was passed in favour of petitioner in a
petition filed against respondent
executing court has only
corrected the mistake made earlier while dismissing the execution petition
itself despite the fact that there was stay from this Court ... said execution petition restored and hence, it is
contended that the executing court has legally and rightly exercised its
power by restoring the execution petition
ground floor was handed over to them at the time of execution of agreement
Civil Revision No.4683 ... defendant no.3 that he alone had contested
the suit for ejectment of the premises in possession of respondent-defendant
no.10 and that even
that petitioners as LRs of Yash Pal filed objection in the execution
petition filed by respondent-decree-holder by taking the plea that ... dispute was delivered to Yash
Pal and hence, they cannot be ejected from the said portion, which was
possessed by Yash Pal. The said objection
Gram Panchayat Village Paluwas vs Maharana Partap Charitable Trust on 25 April, 2011
Author: Ram
favour of his sons, in order to disprove execution of agreement to sell of
Bela Singh as set up by respondents-defendants.
I have heard ... hence, present petitioner alongwith his brothers filed an
application for their ejectment in the court of Assistant Collector First Grade,
Ajnala in which they denied
Kamla Wati And Others vs The Secretary on 11 February, 2011
Author: Ram Chand Gupta
