India has been filed challenging order dated 29th March, 2024 passed in execution case No.3 of 2022. Further prayer for a direction ... ejectment from the property in question. The said suit was decreed ex parte vide judgment and order dated 10th August, 2022 whereafter execution case
issuance of direction to the Executing Court to expedite the proceedings in
Execution Petition bearing No.1742-2024 dated 12.04.2024 titled as Ritu
Chopra ... been numbered as Execution Petition-1742 of
2024 titled as Ritu Chopra Vs. Gobind Gupta . He further submits that the
ejectment petition was filed
under Section 134 of the U.P. Revenue Code Manual, 2006 for ejectment which according to her, were concluded in her favour vide decision dated ... till date the ejectment has not taken place. If it is so, then the remedy lies by way of execution.
3. The writ petition
respondents for possession by way of ejectment and during
the pendency of the present appeal, by way of execution proceedings, the
possession has also been
sought to be enforced
or relied upon, even at the stage of execution and even in collateral
proceedings. A defect of jurisdiction, whether ... appellant in execution. It is already held that it is the Controller
under the Act that has exclusive jurisdiction to order ejectment of a
tenant
sought to be enforced
or relied upon, even at the stage of execution and even in collateral
proceedings. A defect of jurisdiction, whether ... appellant in execution. It is already held that it is the Controller
under the Act that has exclusive jurisdiction to order ejectment of a
tenant
sought to be enforced or relied
upon, even at the stage of execution and even in collateral
proceedings. A defect of jurisdiction, whether ... appellant in execution. It is already held that it is the Controller under
the Act that has exclusive jurisdiction to order ejectment of a tenant
sought to be enforced or relied
upon, even at the stage of execution and even in collateral
proceedings. A defect of jurisdiction, whether ... appellant in execution. It is already held that it is the Controller under
the Act that has exclusive jurisdiction to order ejectment of a tenant
sought to be enforced or
relied upon, even at the stage of execution and even in collateral
proceedings. A defect of jurisdiction, whether ... appellant in execution. It is already held that it is the Controller
under the Act that has exclusive jurisdiction to order ejectment of a
tenant
severance, and entitles the assignee on
the expiry of the term to eject the tenant from the land covered by
the assignment. Section ... execution of
the deed of assignment and is not postponed till the notice of the
assignment is given right to ejectment which is inherent
