ejecting the suit in Eject Suit No.18 of 1988 dated 23.06.2005, on the file of the Registrar, Small Causes Court, Chennai.
2.The petitioner ... ejectment suit No.18 1988 and the same was confirmed by this Court and the Honble Apex Court and the Execution Petition
appellant in execution. It is already held that it is the Controller under the Act that has exclusive jurisdiction to order ejectment of a tenant ... inherently lacks jurisdiction to entertain the suit and pass a decree of ejectment. Therefore, though the decree was passed and the jurisdiction of the Court
defendant and he was paying rent to the plaintiff. When ejectment suit No.136 of 1971 was filed against the first defendant, the first defendant ... Thereafter, the 1st defendant has filed an execution petition in E.A.No.686 of 1980 for execution of sale deed in which, without notice
landlords had obtained an effective decree and had
succeeded in ejecting the tenants as a result of that decree, which may have
become final between ... parties, that decree may not have been re-opened and
the execution taken thereunder may not have been recalled. But it was during
the pendency
also contended by the revision
petitioner that the landlord had suppressed the execution of rental
agreement dated 01.06.1994 and that the petition ... maintainable, as the landlord can only file a civil suit for ejectment.
4. The Wakf Tribunal/ the Principal Subordinate Judge,
Nagapattinam, after full contest, allowed
respondent has filed an execution petition and the petitioner after receipt of notice in execution petition, has filed an application ... been filed by the respondent/landlord against the tenant for eviction, ejectment and also for injunction restraining her from permitting the third party
regularly to the third respondent. Subsequently, the third respondent has filed an Ejectment Suit No.2 of 2001 before the II Judge, Small Causes Court ... eviction. In the meanwhile, the petitioner preferred a petition before the Execution Court to refer the matter to Lok Adalat and the same was dismissed
deprive the
respondent/plaintiff from enjoying the fruits of the decree of ejectment
passed in his favour on 31.10.2011.
3.Records reveal that ... over the suit
premises. E.P.No.1/2012 was filed for execution in which the revision
petitioners have taken out an application stating that
Gopal vs V.A.Sathyanarayanan on 14 November, 2017
Author: M.V.Muralidaran
Bench: M
J.Ayesha Begam vs The Member Secretary on 23 November, 2017
Bench: M.Venugopal , Abdul
