civil suit especially, an ejectment suit by the landlord as against the
tenant. The factum of execution of the lease in the year
repayment
of an additional sum of money.
34.1 Against a decree for ejectment, both
the company and Mr Shankarlal preferred second
appeals to the High ... decree of ejectment. Given this
position, the first respondent i.e., Mr Ibrahim filed
an application for enforcement of the decree of
ejectment against
title,
as the case may be, have been desperately trying its ejection from
the property through multiple litigations ... understanding of the petitioner that there is a need for an
execution of document for formally renewing the lease, whereas
the present petition is based
avoid any process of the Court or to obstruct or delay the execution of
any decree that may be passed against him,—
(i) has absconded ... plaintiff will or
may thereby be obstructed or delayed in the execution of any decree
that may be passed against the defendant in the suit
clear that the entire facts reveal that in original proceedings in
Ejectment suit in E.S.No.75 of 1990, the revision petitioner / defendant /
tenant ... properly intimated to the land lord. So, the Execution
application was dismissed for default in the year 2014 itself
1975 on the file of Principal District Munsif Court,
Poonamallee, for ejectment of her tenant. On 25.03.1978, the suit
was decreed by the trial Court ... third respondent go ahead with
the execution petition on his behalf.
● This was allowed by the Execution Court and unwittingly it gave an
opportunity
1975 on the file of Principal District Munsif Court,
Poonamallee, for ejectment of her tenant. On 25.03.1978, the suit
was decreed by the trial Court ... third respondent go ahead with
the execution petition on his behalf.
● This was allowed by the Execution Court and unwittingly it gave an
opportunity
mother of the plaintiff had
joined the plaintiff as a party in execution of the document which she would
not have done, if the plaintiff ... Whether the plaintiff was entitled to a decree for ejectment without
proof of fact that his vendor was entitled to convey the property under
before this Court to set aside the Ejectment suit No. 32 of
1986 and the same was dismissed. Against the dismissal order ... petitioner filed E.A 4 of 2022 praying to appoint advocate commissioner
Execution Court finally held that as per Ex.B1 sale deed
before the District Munsif Court, Alandur. The suit was laid for
ejectment of tenants. The defendants did not contest the suit and an exparte
decree ... Thereafter, the plaintiff laid
E.P.No.143 of 2007, wherein, the Execution Court ordered notice and the
same was served on the tenants