under Order XXI Rule 97 of Civil
Procedure Code, in execution proceedings relating to Ejectment Suit No.5 of
2005.
2. I have heard ... that are available to a Court to deal with execution petitions arising
out of an ejectment suit. Learned counsel would place reliance on Section
defendants 2 and 3. Hence, the
suit was filed for ejectment.
3. Written statement was filed by the defendants 1 and 2. According to
them ... vide order dated 25.02.2016.
6. When the above decree was put into execution in EP.No.36 of 2014 by
the first respondent, the revision
pendency of the instant
proceedings, the Ejectment suits have been proceeded with and in one or two
cases, execution proceedings have also been initiated
plaintiff/decree
holder had initiated execution proceedings. Pending Execution proceedings,
the revision petitioner, who is a third party suit had filed ... ejectment has been decreed as against
the tenants and as a purchaser from the original plaintiff, they are entitled to
prosecute the execution proceedings. According
Whether the plaintiff/respondent is entitled to file the
suit for ejectment of the appellant in the absence of valid
notice under Section ... notice issued
by the landlord is valid, and the suit for ejectment is legally maintainable.
Consequently, the plaintiff is entitled to the decree as prayed
judgment debtors. The 1 st respondent
had filed an suit for ejectment against the tenants occupying the property
belonging to the first respondent. Pending ... debtors under Order 21 Rule 35 of Civil
Procedure Code. Pending the Execution Petition, the revision petitioners
filed a memo before the Executing Court bringing
According to the revision petitioner, after the ejectment decree was
confirmed by the First Appellate Court, he had entered into a
compromise agreement with ... would also bind the first plaintiff /
Mutt, who has filed the execution proceedings. The Mutt has already
received
docket order
dated 11.11.2024 passed in MP.No.3/2024 in Ejectment Suit
No.57/1991 passed by the II Small Causes Court at Chennai ... rent for a considerable period, the
plaintiff had filed an ejectment suit in OS.No.188 of 1974. Though the
notice has been served
year
01.09.2013, much prior to the institution of the suit, therefore, the Execution
proceedings initiated pursuant to the decree passed in a suit, which ... been passed against
him, and hence, the second defendant cannot avoid the execution. Thus, by
averring so, the learned counsel prayed for setting aside
Court, Nagercoil and allow the Civil Revision
Petition and thereby directing the Execution Court to proceed with the
E.P by executing the decree within ... records reveal that the revision petitioners have
obtained a decree for ejectment as against the respondent herein. The
respondent herein has filed
