section (2) provides that in all cases of suits for the ejectment of a non-occupancy ryot for non-payment of arrears of rent ... 29th June 1909, the decree-holders applied for execution by way of ejectment. On the 3rd August following, the judgment-debtors applied for extension
defendant No. 2, who claims to be a purchaser in execution of a money-decree obtained against defendant No. 1, and defendant ... possession as a landlord who ejected defendant No. 2 on the ground that the transfer in execution to defendant No. 2 was void
landlord to eject a tenant otherwise than in accordance with the provisions of the Act. The provisions of the Act relating to ejectment of under ... Section 89 provides that no tenant shall be ejected from his tenure or holding except in execution of a decree and Section 49 lays down
made on the 20th February 1899. The property was sold in execution and was purchased by the decree-holder on the 19th September ... execution sale which followed, the property was sold on the 24th December 1863. The purchaser sued on the 12th March 1867 to eject the lessee
whether land held by an under-raiyat can be sold in execution of a decree for arrears of rent under the special procedure prescribed ... liable to ejectment for arrears of rent but his tenure or holding shall be liable to sale in execution of a decree for the rent
made on the 20th February 1899. The property was sold in execution and was purchased by the decree-holder on the 19th September ... execution sale which followed, the property was sold on the 24th December 1863. The purchaser sued on the 12th March 1867 to eject the lessee
defendant, lost its character as a rent decree, if, before execution was taken out, the plaintiff had ceased to be the landlord. This view, however ... entitled to execute the decree for ejectment. The same considerations, however, do not apply to an application for execution of a decree for rent
appeal on behalf of the defendants in an action in ejectment. The plaintiff, as landlord of the disputed property, in 1898 sued his tenant, Basu ... name, for arrears of rent. He obtained a decree and in execution thereof brought the property to sale, on the 6th Jane 1898, when
appeal on behalf of the plaintiff in an action in ejectment. The subject-matter of the litigation is an occupancy holding which was purchased ... execution of the decree obtained against them. But he is not entitled to treat the purchaser as a trespasser and sue him in ejectment
action in ejectment. The subject-matter of the litigation is an occupancy-holding which was sold in execution of a money-decree on the 15th
