whose widow is the defendant respondent in these litigations) purchased at an execution sale held on the 20th December 1887, the lands of an under ... Chowdhury, became purchaser at the execution sale. As already stated, Banerjee and Sarkar had made no attempt to eject Chowdhury from the lands of Daskati
appeal arise out of a suit brought by the plaintiff-respondent for ejectment of defendants Nos. 1 and 2 from certain lands on the allegation ... liable to ejectment having obtained possession of these lands by virtue of purchase of the holdings of raiyats under them in execution of decrees
appeal arises out of a suit brought by the plaintiff-respondent for ejectment of defendants Nos. 1 and 2 from certain lands on the allegation ... liable to ejectment having obtained possession of these lands by virtue of purchase of the holdings of raiyats under them in execution of decrees
instituted a suit for arrears of rent and obtained n decree. In execution of that decree the tenure was sold on the 8th January ... 29th April 1918 the plaintiffs landlords instituted the present suit for ejectment on the allegation that the defendants were in unlawful occupation, notwithstanding the sale
holding comprising those plots, at a sale in execution of a decree for arrears of rent obtained by him against the defendants ... plaintiff prays for ejectment of the principal defendants from the 10 1/2 annas share, or, in the alternative, for ejectment from 1/2 anna
Judge of Murshidabad, reversing decree of the Munsif, First Court, Berhampur, for ejectment of the defendant. The facts of the case are as follows ... time belonged to one Patai Sheikh and was purchased at an execution sale by the father of the plaintiffs. After his purchase the plaintiff
being properly represented in mortgage suit his interest did not pass in execution of the mortgage-decree. Therefore, there was no complete transfer ... holdings in the following circumstances:
The defendant purchased the holdings in execution of a mortgage-decree against the original tenants in 1910 and entered into
Sahas, subsequently acquired the right, title and interest of Dhanu at an execution sale. On the 13th December 1909 the Roys instituted a suit ... actual possession and commenced this litigation on the 25th September 1913 to eject the Sahas.
2. It now appears that, before the institution
This is an appeal by the plaintiffs in an action for ejectment. The plaintiffs and the defendant were co-sharers in a taluq which comprised ... first plaintiff purchased the occupancy holding in execution of a mortgage-decree. The legal effect of this purchase was that the holding ceased to exist
being properly represented in mortgage suit his interest did not pass in execution of the mortgage-decree. There-fore, there was no complete transfer ... holdings in the following circumstances:
The defendant purchased the holdings in execution of a mortgage decree against the original tenants in 1910 and entered into
