Execution Case No. 15 of 1967 pleading the said facts. They claim that they are not liable to be dispossessed in execution of the ejectment ... Execution Case No. 15 of 1967) seeking protection against dispossession in execution of the said ejectment decree on the ground that he was a lawful
mentioned in proviso to Rule 5, the ejectment of the respondent, in execution can only be sought for during the period of 15th April ... Sethi does not say that the delivery of possession in execution of decree for ejectment could be taken at any time during the year
dismissal of the application filed by landlord owners for execution of the ejectment decree, on account of the provisions of the subsequently enacted Delhi (Urban ... section 3 no tenant of land was to be ejected from the land whether in execution of a decree or order of a court
dismissed on 16.12.1991. Thereafter, the decree holder filed an application for execution of the decree.
4. It appears that the judgment debtor did not raise ... objector was in possession through his father and has to be ejected in execution of the decree. It is submitted that the decree holder
tenant between the parties and they could not be ejected in execution of the decree because of the bar under the Delhi Rent Control
landlord applied for execution of the order
of the ejectment and during the said execution proceedings the
appellant/defendant sought time till 31st March ... 20th December, 2001 in this
regard in the proceedings for execution of the ejectment order
was handed over;
RFA No.842/2003 Page
forth in Rule 32 which
reads as follows: -
"32. Execution of ejectment order in such cases ( Section 47 )-
(1) Every application for ejectment ... order.
(2) The delivery of possession in execution of a decree or order
for ejectment shall be made by the Kanungo, who, on his
arrival
back as 1964, Sharafuddin and Shahabuddid made an application for ejectment of their tenant, Mohammed Din. from premises No. 7687, Ward No. Xiv, Gali Takhat ... term 'tenant' and could not therefore be ejected in execution of the eviction order. On 26th March, 1976, the Additional Rent Controller dismissed
passed against all the defendants/JDs; that in execution of the said ejectment decree, the decree "holder went to take possession on 30.11.94; that ... passed against all the defendants/JDs; that in execution of .the said ejectment decree, the decree holder went to take possession on 30.11.94; that
facts are similar inasmuch as here also the ejectment decree
was not put to execution and no permission even of the
Competent Authority under ... aforesaid, it is held :
i) That on account of non execution of the ejectment order
passed in 1957 which was in executable as there
