nullity, and that its or relied upon, even at the stage of
execution and even in collateral proceedings. A defect of
jurisdiction, whether ... appellant in execution. It is already held that it is the
11
Controller under the Act that has exclusive jurisdiction to order
ejectment
sought to be enforced
or relied upon, even at the stage of execution and even in collateral
proceedings. A defect of jurisdiction, whether ... appellant in execution. It is
already held that it is the Controller under the Act that has exclusive
jurisdiction to order ejectment of a tenant
sought to be enforced or relied upon,
even at the stage of execution and even in collateral proceedings.
A defect of jurisdiction, whether ... appellant in execution. It is already held that it is the Controller
under the Act that has exclusive jurisdiction to order ejectment of a
tenant
sought to be enforced or relied upon, even at the
stage of execution and even in collateral proceedings. A defect ... appellant in execution. It is already held that it is the
Controller under the Act that has exclusive jurisdiction to order
ejectment of a tenant
sought to be
enforced or relied upon, even at the stage of execution and even in collateral proceedings. A
defect of jurisdiction, whether ... appellant in execution. It is already held that it is the Controller
under the Act that has exclusive jurisdiction to order ejectment of a tenant
sought to be enforced
or relied upon, even at the stage of execution and even in collateral
proceedings. A defect of jurisdiction, whether ... appellant in execution. It is
already held that it is the Controller under the Act that has exclusive
jurisdiction to order ejectment of a tenant
M/S. Aamby Valley Ltd., Mumbai vs Acit, New Delhi on 22 February, 2019
IN
Ishvakoo Grand Plaza, New Delhi vs Dcit, Circle- 54(1), New Delhi on 10 May
Dcit (Ltu), New Delhi vs M/S. Mawana Sugar Ltd., New Delhi on 30 August
Mawana Sugars Limited., New Delhi vs Dcit, New Delhi on 30 August, 2024
IN THE
