sought to
be enforced or relied upon, even at the stage of execution and
even in collateral proceedings. A defect of jurisdiction, whether ... appellant in execution. It is already held that it is the
Controller under the Act that has exclusive jurisdiction to order
ejectment of a tenant
sought
to be enforced or relied upon, even at the stage of execution
and even in collateral proceedings. A defect of jurisdiction,
whether ... appellant in execution. It is
already held that it is the Controller under the Act that has
exclusive jurisdiction to order ejectment of a tenant
sought to
be enforced or relied upon, even at the stage of execution and
even in collateral proceedings. A defect of jurisdiction, whether ... appellant in execution. It is
already held that it is the Controller under the Act that has
exclusive jurisdiction to order ejectment of a tenant
Narang Overseas Pvt. Ltd. vs The Acit on 28 February, 2007
ORDER
K.C. Singhal
Shree Global Tradefin Ltd, Mumbai vs Dcit Cen Cir 5(1), Mumbai on 15 October
Rohan Software Pvt. Ltd. vs Income Tax Officer on 30 August, 2007
Equivalent citations: [2008
Shri. Vasanth Damodar Shetty, Mumbai vs Ito 25 (1)(4), Mumbai on 27 October, 2021
