years old may be read in evidence without proof of its execution, although the testator has died within 30 years and, some of the subscribing ... evidence of a certain fact in a suit for ejectment, without proof of its execution. It was not a case of proving a Will
which the defendants would be ejected from the land. The decree was dated the 25th May 1892. In execution of this decree the above-mentioned ... executed, and the defendants were ejected on the 4th July 1892. The mortgagee subsequently took out execution of the decree for rent and purchased
civil Court in execution, the provisions of the Code of Civil Procedure relating to execution would apply to such proceedings in execution except ... meantime, the owner got possession of the property in execution of the order of ejectment. The order in ejectment having been set aside, the opposite
execute the decree and this execution of the decree means execution according to law. The words "in execution of a decree" mentioned ... landlord is to put the said decree into execution for recovery of possession by ejecting the tenant. There is, therefore, no scope again for filing
this form:
Whether an objection to an execution sale on the ground that the decree in execution of which the sale took place was satisfied ... possession of the property sold in execution of the decree although such objection was raised in execution proceedings but was not determined on account
been illegally ejected.
6. Section 44 of the Bengal Tenancy Act declares that a non-occupancy raiyat shall be liable to ejectment only on certain ... Section 89 declares that no tenant shall be ejected from his tenure or holding except in execution of a decree. The law thus declares
ejected at any time in spite of the qabuliat, and the only remedy for a person in possession who is ejected contrary to the terms ... obtain damages. He cannot obtain possession of the premises. Therefore the execution of the qabuliat does not defeat the provisions of Section
order passed by the Court below, if put into execution, will be to eject the petitioner who is in possession and whose possession
suit, the object of the landlord is to eject the sub-lessee from the land in execution of the decree and such an object
started execution proceedings early in July, 1949 when the defendant made another application making the case that he was not liable to be ejected because ... that a decree-holder wro has resisted in the execution of a decree for ejectment may apply for possession again and again and, if again