relating to
ejectment and in Clause I relating to ejectment. Clause A
clearly contemplates ejectment of the Bhowals in execution
of the compromise decree ... liable to ejectment
by appropriate action in a court of law. This is in
contradistinction to the ejectment in execution of the
compromise decree contemplated
Suit was filed by the landlordrespondent no. 3 seeking
ejectment and arrears of rent against the petitionertenant. The
matter was referred ... default,
the plaintifflandlord was entitled to recover the same and eject the
tenantpetitioner. When the petitioner failed to comply with the terms
Shri G. C. Gupta, Subordinate Judge, 1st Class, Delhi, in Execution Case No. 84 of 1966 in Suit No. 540 of 1956 on his file ... Execution Petition on Jane, 1966. Prior to that date, on 4th Jane, 1966; the petitionerr filed an application contending that after the decree for ejectment
Chennai City Tenants Protection Act will come to an end only on execution of Sale Deed either by Temple or by the Court onbehalf ... This Revision arises on the following facts:- Petitioner / Temple has filed Ejectment Suit in O.S.No. 33 of 1981. In the said Suit, Respondent
Satyanarayan Prosad vs Diana Engineering Co. on 29 January, 1951
Equivalent citations: AIR1952CAL124, 55CWN509, AIR
N. Sreedharan Nair And Ors. vs Mottaipatti Chinna Pallivasal Muslim ... on 4 March, 2003
Equivalent
Indian Hotel Co. Ltd. vs T. Stevenson on 13 April, 1981
Equivalent citations: AIR1982BOM160, AIR
Ashokkumar Manilal vs Gandhi Vrajilal Gabrrulal Dessa on 8 February, 1995
Equivalent citations: AIR1995GUJ161, (1995
Sukesh Vohra vs Sulekh Chand Jain on 19 May, 1997
Equivalent citations: 1997IVAD(DELHI)479
Dr. Shashi Ranjan Gupta vs M/S Spraylac Paints Corporation on 17 December, 2013
Author
