likely to change the altogether plea taken by the
petitioner for ejectment of respondent from the
property in dispute. Even otherwise, the said order ... when he got the possession of the aforesaid shop
in execution of ejectment order dated 08.03.2010. It is also a matter of
record that
order dated 12.9.2011 the objections filed by
the petitioner to the execution of ejectment order dated 25.9.1984, passed by
the Appellate Authority, Hoshiarpur, were rejected
Admittedly, the aforesaid order of ejectment has become final between the
parties.
The respondent filed an execution application in which the
petitioner was proceeded against ... that the same have
been raised only to delay the execution of the ejectment order. Not only
this, admittedly, the petitioner is in arrears
parties after the execution of the sale deed dated 21.02.1990,
in his favour. The petitioner was liable to be ejected from the demised
premises ... required the demised premises for his personal use and occupation.
The ejectment application was contested by the tenant. In
the written statement filed on behalf
service was effected upon
him in the said ejectment petition as he was already contesting another
ejectment petition filed against him by the respondent earlier ... applicant on the basis of ex parte ejectment order.
Respondent Yashwant Rai has already filed execution
application to get possession of the shop in dispute
ejectment petition stating
that he was a tenant under Dilbagh Rai at the time of creation of tenancy
and also at the time of execution ... maintainable. The respondents were owning
sufficient properties and were seeking ejectment of six tenants occupying
different shops belonging to them and the petitioner was entitled
denied the execution of the said rent
note. Not even a whisper has been raised against the execution of the rent
note ... Despite the fact that respondent-landlord in his ejectment
application has specifically averred that rent note was executed by the
petitioner in favour
case are that respondents No. 1 to 3 filed an
ejectment application against the petitioner and respondent No.4 from the
demised premises ... also the case of the respondent landlord that at the time
of execution of the sale deed of the demised premises the original owner
Shri
deem fit and in accordance with
such procedure as may be prescribed, eject any person
who is in wrongful or unauthorized possession of the
land ... exercise the
powers of a revenue Court in relation to the execution of
a decree for possession of land under the Punjab
Tenancy
adopt appropriate procedure to seek
ejectment of the tenant Sh. Madan Lal appropriate
procedure to seek ejectment of the tenant Sh. Madan
Lal from ... taken by the
Executing Court.
Therefore, the application of the landlord for
ejectment of the tenant/application is held to be not
maintainable
