Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

respondent is initiate the greceedings for the execution of the ejectment decree. At the time of handing over of the vacant prassesfis

only appeared pefore the Executing Court fo resist the execution based On 86 nes docun ents w hich i is Of the year 1998 onwards ... undisputed point of time, the Executing Court has . right ly te ejected the case of the applicant. To raise a contention that the decree ought

question, delivered poisséssiefié :£)f'°iE}i£:'{pr-émises in the execution ... pursuant to the jL1cjghjfe11t.: t}§é"TS{1it for ejectment and th erfl0r€:- the w1*i"; rendered infrucmous. that isV"5e;:vvpdi

Bodi Narasappa vs State Of Karnataka on 22 September, 2011 Author: Jawad Rahim Bench: Jawad

Satish S/O Late Ganapathsa Meharwade vs The State Of Karnataka on 6 July, 2011

Sri Y Chenna Reddy vs Smt Gowramma on 8 February, 2011 RSA 526/O8

Mr Abdul Majeed vs Diocese Of Mangalore on 30 August, 2011 Author: H N Nagamohan

Smt K Prema W/O Late A Sanjeeva vs Diocese Of Mangalore on 30 August

Sri Iqbal Pasha vs Sri G Basavaraj on 11 February, 2011 Author: Ashok B.Hinchigeri

following: ot JUDGMENT Appeal is by the tenant agaist the order oF -ejectment passed by the HT Addi. ¢ ity Civil & Sessions Jud; ze, , Bangalore ... regard, respondent also a greed i) file ar undertaking not to file execution petition til 26 S.20Eb to enable the defendant