which an application for stay of the Execution Case No.
101 of 2007 is rejected.
Ejectment Suit No. 1634 of 2000 was filed
seeking eviction ... owners are not made parties in
the said Ejectment Suit.
An application for stay of the execution
proceeding is also taken out in the said
service, and
accordingly, vide order dated 06.01.2011 ex parte ejectment order was
passed against her. Execution proceedings were filed by the respondent
facts of the case are that private respondents filed an
application for ejectment of the petitioner under Section 9(2) read with
Section ... ejected from the land in
question. Against that order, petitioner filed revision, which has been rejected,
vide order dated 9.2.2005. Thereafter, an execution application
orders passed by the Revenue Courts, dismissing his application
for execution of the ejectment order dated 20.02.2001passed against
the private respondents.
The above-stated
ejected from the land
in question. Against that order, petitioners filed revision, which has been
rejected, vide order dated 9.2.2005. Thereafter, an execution application ... execution,
the petitioners cannot say that they may be permitted to deposit the rent. The
order of the competent authority for ejectment
portion occupied by another tenant through execution of an order of
ejectment. Both the applications were declined vide impugned order.
Thereafter, the present petitioners (respondent
injunction holding that
defendants have taken possession of suit schedule property
in Execution Petition No.749/2008, which was filed to
execute the decree passed ... plaintiff
3
and there was decree for ejectment. The defendants have
taken possession from plaintiff in Execution Petition
No.749/2008. The learned trial Judge
that decree holder/respondent had
filed an ejectment petition against the petitioner(tenant)/JD seeking his
ejectment in which the petitioner(tenant) was proceeded ... proceeding itself can be made in the main ejectment
proceedings and not in execution application as the Executing Court cannot
go behind the decree/order
Court, Phagwara is directed to decide the execution
application by 15.05.2012 since it is contended that the ejectment order was
passed on 07.10.2003.
5. Accordingly
ordered the ejectment of respondent No.4.
Against that order, no appeal was filed. Thereafter, the petitioner filed
an execution application. In the execution proceedings ... execution of that order, application was moved
by the petitioner before the Assistant Collector Ist Grade. The
Assistant Collector First Grade has declined the execution
