Tehsildar, Delhi, for execution."
(ii) Admittedly, the Revenue Authorities did not take any steps for execution of the
ejectment order dated 30.04.1982. Instead ... Shahdara. In these execution proceedings, the defendants took a
stand that the period of limitation to file execution proceedings against
ejectment order dated
Tehsildar, Delhi, for execution."
(ii) Admittedly, the Revenue Authorities did not take any steps for execution of the
ejectment order dated 30.04.1982. Instead ... Shahdara. In these execution proceedings, the defendants took a
stand that the period of limitation to file execution proceedings against
ejectment order dated
Tehsildar, Delhi, for execution."
(ii) Admittedly, the Revenue Authorities did not take any steps for execution of the
ejectment order dated 30.04.1982. Instead ... Shahdara. In these execution proceedings, the defendants took a
stand that the period of limitation to file execution proceedings against
ejectment order dated
Tehsildar, Delhi, for execution."
(ii) Admittedly, the Revenue Authorities did not take any steps for execution of the
ejectment order dated 30.04.1982. Instead ... Shahdara. In these execution proceedings, the defendants took a
stand that the period of limitation to file execution proceedings against
ejectment order dated
Tehsildar, Delhi, for execution."
(ii) Admittedly, the Revenue Authorities did not take any steps for execution of the
ejectment order dated 30.04.1982. Instead ... Shahdara. In these execution proceedings, the defendants took a
stand that the period of limitation to file execution proceedings against
ejectment order dated
Tehsildar, Delhi, for execution."
(ii) Admittedly, the Revenue Authorities did not take any steps for execution of the
ejectment order dated 30.04.1982. Instead ... Shahdara. In these execution proceedings, the defendants took a
stand that the period of limitation to file execution proceedings against
ejectment order dated
Tehsildar, Delhi, for execution."
(ii) Admittedly, the Revenue Authorities did not take any steps for execution of the
ejectment order dated 30.04.1982. Instead ... Shahdara. In these execution proceedings, the defendants took a
stand that the period of limitation to file execution proceedings against
ejectment order dated
Tehsildar, Delhi, for execution."
(ii) Admittedly, the Revenue Authorities did not take any steps for execution of the
ejectment order dated 30.04.1982. Instead ... Shahdara. In these execution proceedings, the defendants took a
stand that the period of limitation to file execution proceedings against
ejectment order dated
that the ex parte decree has been put to execution vide
Ejectment Execution Case No. 191 of 2006.
4
f) Being alarmed the petitioner filed ... 23rd March, 2011, in default, the
7
order of stay of Ejectment Execution Case No. 191 of 2006 shall stand vacated.
The petitioner/appellant
decree against the opposite
party no.1 on 19th September, 2011 in Ejectment Suit No.455 of 2010 from the
court of learned Civil Judge ... Alipore. The said exparte
2
decree was put into execution in Ejectment Execution No.271 of 2011 before the
Court of learned Civil Judge (Junior
