summons, defendant appeared
and filed her written statement admitting thereunder the
6
execution of agreement of sale dated 05.05.2003 but
interalia contended that time ... 2013 (O.S.No.6539/2006)
7. Defendant filed a suit for ejectment against the
plaintiffs in respect of suit schedule property contending that
second
time
of Sri R.P.Shah, he had filed a suit for ejectment and
possession in O.S.No.3778/1995 alleging that ... plaintiffs are
the tenants, which came to be decreed erroneously and
when execution petition was filed to execute the decree,
Panchayat was held between plaintiffs
rents. The said Smt.K J V
Jayalakshmi filed a suit for ejectment against the tenant viz.
the 8th respondent herein ... decree,
legal heirs of Smt.K.J.V.Jayalakshmi filed Execution Petition
in E.P.No.1819/2011. In the said execution petition, an
application
decree passed by the trial court and
prays for dismissal of ejectment suit.
4. Per contra, Sri H.S.Somnath, learned
counsel appearing for respondent ... Holder,
had no personal knowledge about the entire
transaction, which resulted in execution of Ex.D-2 and
no amount of evidence tendered by said
that the
discretionary power vested with the executing court to
stay the execution proceedings by invoking Rule 29 of
Order XXI is conspicuously absent ... execution proceedings initiated by the decree
holder of O.S.No.96/2003 to stay the execution
proceedings. It is in this background, co-ordinate
arise at all and as such, they denied the very
execution of agreement of sale dated 22.09.1997.
9. They also contended that ... arise at all. On this
ground also they denied the execution of agreement by
Sri Basavaraju.
10. They further contended that plaintiff and her
husband
also came to be dismissed.
2. Respondent herein filed a suit for ejectment in
O.S.252/2012 which came to be decreed by Judgment ... application for stay. Lower Appellate court
3
allowed I.A.2 and execution of Judgment and decree
passed in O.S.252/2012 came
herein unconditionally and without driving the respondents
herein to take possession through execution proceedings.
His submission is placed on record.
5. In view ... licensor namely
IOCL and as such they filed a suit for ejectment in
O.S.No.1347/2005 against their licensor namely IOCL
which ultimately
CITY
CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BANGALORE, PARTLY
DECREEING THE SUIT FILED FOR EJECTMENT.
2
THIS RFA COMING ON FOR ADMISSION THIS DAY,
THE COURT DELIVERED ... Bangalore, dated 08.02.2012 in O.S.No.2254/2009
decreeing suit for ejectment and directing the defendant
to quit, vacate and hand over vacant possession
compromise
petition".
2. Petitioners are present before the court. They admit
execution of compromise petition and have affixed their
signatures to the compromise petition ... 15216/2011 insofar as decreeing
the suit for ejectment is concerned and time granted
by trial court stands enlarged upto to 03.02.2016.
2. Parties
