whereby, application moved by
the petitioner to stay the execution proceedings with regard to
ejectment order passed by the Rent Controller was dismissed.
Learned counsel ... question. Petitioner
was not made party to the ejectment proceedings. Hence, the
application to stay the execution proceedings was liable to be
allowed.
Sheela Rani
Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949 ('Act' for short)
seeking ejectment of the petitioner on the ground of personal
necessity and arrears ... tenant between the parties as well as execution of the
rent note. The other contentions in the ejectment petition, were
Singh Gurpreet
said ejectment petition was allowed
by the Rent Controller vide order dated 18.11.2009 (Annexure P4).
During the execution proceedings, petitioners filed the objection
petition claiming ... filed by the petitioner
on the ground that the execution petition had been filed seeking
execution of the order dated 18.11.2009 (Annexure P4) passed
said ejectment petition was allowed
by the Rent Controller vide order dated 30.9.2009 (Annexure P3).
During the execution proceedings, petitioners filed the objection
petition claiming ... filed by the petitioner
on the ground that the execution petition had been filed seeking
execution of the order dated 30.9.2009 (Annexure P3) passed
dispose of the appeal expeditiously.
In the present case respondents had sought
ejectment of the petitioner. The said petition was allowed vide order
dated ... submissions made by learned counsel
for the respondents, the execution of the ejectment order dated
29.10.2011 passed by the Rent Controller shall remain stayed during
judgment/decree dated 22.8.2008 in ex parte.
Petitioner has filed ejectment petition in an execution petition
moved by respondent No. 1- decree holder. Thereafter, petitioner
mesne profits have been assessed
by the appellate authority.
Respondent had filed ejectment petition against the
petitioners. The same was allowed by the Rent Controller ... whereas petitioners
moved an application for stay of the execution and operation of the
ejectment order dated 08.02.2012. The appellate authority, vide
impugned order dated
whereby objection petition filed by the respondent
had been accepted and the execution petition filed by the
petitioner-landlord, was dismissed.
Petitioner had filed petition ... Haryana Urban (Control of Rent and Eviction) Act, 1973 seeking
ejectment of the respondent on the ground of arrears of rent.
Admittedly
short)
seeking ejectment of the petitioner from the premises in question.
Case of the respondent, as per the ejectment petition, in
brief, was that ... between the parties and the execution of the rent note
in question. However, the other contentions in the ejectment
petition, were denied.
On the pleadings
Raghuvinder Singh, Advocate,
for the respondents.
****
SABINA, J.
Respondents had filed the ejectment petition against the
petitioners on the ground of arrears of rent, personal ... ordered the ejectment of the petitioners on the
ground of personal necessity.
During the course of arguments, it has transpired that in
execution proceedings, possession
