Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

C Chinnappa vs Mr P Chandramouly S/O.Late ... on 22 April, 2014 Author: Ashok

2013 ALLOWING I.A.NO.I IN EXECUTION PETITION NO.49/2013 AT ANNEXURE-E DISMISSAL OF EXECUTION PETITION NO.49/2013 PASSED ... Civil Judge(Junior Division) at Hubli for ejectment against the respondent and the suit was decreed. Thereafter, execution petition was filed in No.49/2013

sought for writ of mandamus. The execution proceedings are pending. As the decree is for ejection, it is needless to say the executing court shall

Additional City Civil Judge, Bangalore, partly decreeing the suit for ejectment and etc. This RFA, coming on for admission, this day, the Court delivered ... respondents voluntarily without driving them to file execution petition to execute the decree of ejection passed by the Trial Court. 2. The appellant has agreed

Order 21 Rule 29 of CPC , seeking stay of the execution proceedings (i.e., Execution Case 5 No.1341/2013) till disposal ... questioning maintainability of the Execution case. 4. All the three applications were filed in Execution Case No.1341/2013, arising from the judgment and decree

summons, defendant appeared and filed her written statement admitting thereunder the 6 execution of agreement of sale dated 05.05.2003 but interalia contended that time ... 2013 (O.S.No.6539/2006) 7. Defendant filed a suit for ejectment against the plaintiffs in respect of suit schedule property contending that second

said to be the plaintiff, who had filed the suit for ejectment against the defendant, who is none other than his brother and the said ... ejectment as well as in the appeal and the same having been negatived, such a contention would no longer be a bar for the execution

DATED 04.03.2014 (ANNEXURE-B) PASSED BY THE LEARNED CIVIL JUDGE, ANKOLA, IN EXECUTION PETITION NO.119 OF 2011. THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS ... 2004 for ejectment. The appeal filed by the petitioner in R.A.No.91/2007 has been dismissed. Thereafter, execution proceedings have been initiated

counsel for respective parties. The execution is of the year 2011. After the suit was decreed for ejectment, raising some ground tenants are before this

time of Sri R.P.Shah, he had filed a suit for ejectment and possession in O.S.No.3778/1995 alleging that ... plaintiffs are the tenants, which came to be decreed erroneously and when execution petition was filed to execute the decree, Panchayat was held between plaintiffs