entertain the suit for ejectment was a nullity and the judgment-debtors successfully could object to the execution of the said decree being a nullity ... only authority to pass a decree for ejectment of the tenanted premises is the Rent Controller appointed under the Act and Section
came to the notice of the applicants/appellants, from their Counsel, when Execution Application/Criminal Petition, was filed by the Decree Holder/complainant ... consumer complaint, as they had vacated the premises, in pursuance of the ejectment order dated 21.10.2013 Annexure A-3, passed
consumer complaint, as they had vacated the premises, in pursuance of the ejectment order dated 21.10.2013 Annexure A-3, passed ... came to the notice of the applicants/appellants, from their Counsel, when Execution Application/Criminal Petition, was filed by the Decree Holders/complainants
came to the notice of the applicants/appellants, from their Counsel, when Execution Application/Criminal Petition, was filed by the Decree Holder/complainant ... consumer complaint, as they had vacated the premises, in pursuance of the ejectment order dated 21.10.2013 Annexure A-3, passed
consumer complaint, as they had vacated the premises, in pursuance of the ejectment order dated 29.10.2013 (infact 21.10.2013) Annexure A-3, passed ... appellants, from their Counsel, only on 27.04.2015, during the pendency of the Execution Application/Criminal Petition, filed by the Decree Holders/complainants. It was further
enforced or relied upon, and even at the stage
of execution or collateral proceedings.
17. We are unable to agree with the learned counsel ... ejectment and recovery of rent
against the Appellant. Ex-parte decree of eviction was passed
which became final. The Respondent filed an execution
application
consumer complaint, as they had vacated the premises, in pursuance of the ejectment order dated 21.10.2013 Annexure A-3, passed by the Court ... notice of the applicants/appellants, when they received notice, in the Execution Application/ Criminal Petition, by the Decree Holder/complainant, on 04.04.2015. It was further
consumer complaint, as they had vacated the premises, in pursuance of the ejectment order dated 21.10.2013 Annexure A-4, passed by the Court ... appellants, from their Counsel, only on 30.03.2015, during the pendency of the Execution Application/Criminal Petition, filed by the Decree Holders/complainants. It was further
consumer complaint, as they had vacated the premises, in pursuance of the ejectment order dated 21.10.2013 Annexure A-4, passed ... notice of the applicants/appellants, when they received notice, in the Execution Application/Criminal Petition, filed by the Decree Holders/complainant. It was further stated
oath in his affidavit that he had no pending
dispute whatsoever after execution of the sale deed, with any one.
He also deposed in that ... electricity authority
to the effect that complainant had filed an ejectment petition against
him and others, as tenants, on 21.02.2012. As per the affidavit
