meanwhile, the petitioner has filed
execution proceedings in Ex. No.2303/2015 putting
to execution the decree for ejectment drawn ... Adalat and bringing about a decree
for ejectment by consensus, and
[v] that the execution petition in Ex.
No.2303/2015 is filed
meanwhile, the petitioner has filed
execution proceedings in Ex. No.2303/2015 putting
to execution the decree for ejectment drawn ... Adalat and bringing about a decree
for ejectment by consensus, and
[v] that the execution petition in Ex.
No.2303/2015 is filed
implead herself in the Execution proceedings.
She filed an ejectment suit against one Muruga and it was
decreed ex parte on 23.01.2019. She dragged Execution ... Affidavit, first appellant has stated that one Muruga
was their tenant, an ejectment suit was filed against him
and the same was decreed. First appellant
between it and the respondents in so far as it
relates to ejectment / vacation of the properties in its
possession as a tenant and both ... voluntarily and without driving the respondents to sue for
execution of the decree for ejectment under the decree
passed in the above appeal. The respondents
Rent, (8) Permanent
injunction.
(b) Track-II: (1)Execution cases, (2) Divorce, (3)
Ejectment.
(c) Track-III: (1) Partition, (2) Declaration, (3)
specific performance
court and first appellate court. The trial
court granted the decree for ejectment in favour of the
plaintiff/landlord and the first appellate court confirmed ... lease is 30 years
5 months from the date of execution of lease deed.
4. The plaintiff would contend that
Section 8
of the Karnataka Small Cause Courts Act, any suit for
ejectment of a tenant based on an agreement in writing or
oral ... Court of Small Causes.
When the petitioners filed the suit for ejectment of the
respondent, they rightly initiated proceedings before the
Small Causes Court. However
matter that has to be stated before the trial
court in Execution petition and not before this
court."
6. It is observed that after ... respondents have devised this in an effort to sustain
the petition for ejectment to recover possession of a
portion of the agricultural land
suit in S.C.No.1552/2019 against the 4th respondent
for ejectment and other reliefs in relation to the suit schedule
immovable property ... favour of the appellant
herein to agitated her claim in the present execution proceedings
as an obstructor. Pursuant to the said liberty granted by this
2012, which is put into execution in the
present execution case, is an ex parte Judgment and
notwithstanding the suit commenced by the
respondent ... that the respondent could not have sought
for the petitioner's ejectment without vindication of
his title to the subject property
