Article 12 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Santa Bai , the Madras High Court evolved the principle of ejusdem generis i.e. of the “like nature”. It means that those authorities are covered
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 3861 (2.01 seconds)Constitution of India
Santa Bai , the Madras High Court evolved the principle of ejusdem generis i.e. of the “like nature”. It means that those authorities are covered
Rajasthan State Electricity Board, ... vs Mohan Lal & Ors on 3 April, 1967
interpreting the expression "other authority" the principle
of ejusdem generis should not be applied, because, for the
application of that rule, there must ... local authorities, and the expression "other authorities",
if read ejusdem generis with those named, cannot cover the
Board which is a body corporate
P. Mohanraj vs M/S. Shah Brothers Ispat Pvt. Ltd. on 1 March, 2021
object of
Section 14 , no rule of construction, be it ejusdem generis or noscitur a
sociis can be used to cut down the plain meaning ... applicability to corporate debtors is concerned. He relied
upon the ejusdem generis/noscitur a sociis rules of construction that had,
in fact, been applied
Jage Ram And Ors vs State Of Haryana And Ors on 2 March, 1971
Section 17(2) (c) cannot be interpreted
ejusdem Generis-Scope of s. 17(2) (c)-Maxims-Ejusdem
Generis-Scope of Rule.
HEADNOTE:
In March ... read by itself covered a very large field, applying
the ejusdem generis Rule that provision had to be given a
narrower meaning because
M/S. Grasim Industries Limited vs Collector Of Customs, Bombay on 4 April, 2002
Chapter 84, it is submitted that by
application of the ejusdem generis principles, only such articles
which are similar to millstones or grindstones are excluded ... assessee it
has to be further seen whether the principles of ejusdem generis have
application. The rule is applicable when particular words pertaining
Maharashtra University Of Health ... vs Satchikista Prasarak Mandal & Ors on 25 February, 2010
aforesaid two Sections, the High
Court, following the principle of "ejusdem
generis" held that 5th and 6th respondent, being
unapproved teachers ... High Court has not properly appreciated
the principle of ejusdem generis in
understanding the scope of Section 2(35) read
with Section
Vikram Singh @ Vicky & Anr vs Union Of India & Ors on 21 August, 2015
other person’ appearing in Section
364A ought to be read ejusdem generis with the expression preceding the
said words. The argument needs notice only ... rejected. The rule of
ejusdem generis is a rule of construction and not a rule of law. Courts
have to be very careful in applying
The Mysore State Electricity Board vs Bangalore Woollen, Cotton And Silk ... on 15 November, 1962
necessary to decide whether the rule
of ejusdeme generis applied in interpreting the expression
"other person ... necessary to invoke the rule of ejusdem generis to
interpret the expression "other person" in that section so
as to bring a consumer
The State Of Maharashtra vs Jagan Gagansingh Nepali on 5 August, 2011
MCOCA" for short) has to be read ejusdem generis
with the words "for pecuniary benefits and undue
economic", the matter is placed ... term "other
advantage" has to be read as ejusdem generis with
the words "gaining pecuniary benefits, or gaining
undue economic advantage