Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 37846 (4.59 seconds)

Anuradha Sharma vs Tata Power Delhi Distribution Limited on 17 July, 2025

electricity connection, i.e. lease-holder, was using the electricity connection under the authorisation of the actual owner of the property and the electricity connection ... electricity connection, i.e. lease-holder, was using the electricity connection under the authorization of the actual owner of the property and the electricity connection
State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Cites 27 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Smt.Saraswati Bai (Deleted) And Anr. vs Shri Krishna Gour (Deleted) Through ... on 14 January, 2026

electricity connection which was installed in the disputed house was in his name and thereafter he got the said electricity connection transferred in the name ... electricity connection transferred in the name of Roopram Kahar if the premises was not sublet to him ?. Therefore, the transfer of the electricity connection
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 17 - Cited by 0 - G S Ahluwalia - Full Document

Sh. Ajit Singh vs Ajit Mittal on 29 March, 2011

basis of the NOC and Electricity Restoration Application, accused Ajit Mittal got the electricity connection transferred in his name. 4 On the basis of allegations ... connection transferred in his name. Thus, by this act of his, accused Ajit Mittal deceived and cheated the BSES authority to transfer the electricity connection
Delhi District Court Cites 12 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next